Archive for June, 2010

June 30, 2010

The aggression of India

Pakistani Perspective:

The conventional wisdom in India is that Pakistan is the aggressor in South Asia.  Pakistan hardly has a perfect record but Indians should not throw stones before reviewing their own history.  Even if Indo-Pakistan relationship is set aside for a moment as one of peculiar nature and even if Pakistan is presumed to be responsible for all the wicked behaviour, the question arises why do other countries of the region find it so difficult to forge a closer relationship with India? Why is it that India has failed to evoke trust and confidence among its neighbours to make any worthwhile collaboration impossible, including Saarc? Isn’t it time for hostilities to give way to a congenial environment among South Asian neighbours too?

LIST COMPILED BY REFORMISTANI

Pre-partition Hostility

  • India withheld Pakistan’s share of funds and resources from the very beginning of its birth.  The newborn nation financed its treasury with donated  silverware from ordinary citizens and funds from the Nizam of Hyderabad, Habib family.
  • India withheld 297 trainloads of supplies allocated to Pakistan.  (3 trainloads were sent with scrap).

Land Grabbing & Invasions

  • India threatened England in order to take Gurduspur and Ferozpur allocated to Pakistan
  • India swallowed Junagarh on the basis of majority hindu against the wishes of its nawab who had acceeded to Pakistan.
  • India swallowed Hyderabad on the basis of majority hindu against the wishes of its nizam
  • India swallowed Kashmir on the basis of the maharaja ‘wishes’ irrespective of the muslim majority’s wishes.  The instrument of ascension was conveniently “lost”.
  • India swallowed the princely state of Bantva-Manavadar and it 26 muslim villages.
  • India invaded and absorbed Goa 4,000 Portugese security with a force of 30,000 on the basis of a foreign presence on “republic of India’s” land.
  • India annexed Sikkim by formenting a coup against the Buddhist king manipulating the grievances of his subjects.  The prime  minister that supported India was labelled a traitor by his own people.  5000 Indian soldiers stormed a force of 243.  1 nineteen year old palace guard was killed.  Sikkim the tiny country was no more
  • India maintains contested boundary sections with Nepal  including 400 sq. km over the Kalapani River.
  • India continues to stall negotiations on disputed territory in Sir Creek with Pakistan
  • India invaded Siachen Glacier
  • India swallowed Minicoy Islands (forgotten by the British) without any negotiation with the other dominion (pakistan)
  • Indian encroached on Nepali lands and committed atrocities along the border villages of western district of Dang. These actions resulted in the displacement of more than 6000 people from their homes. Cases of rape and disappearance have been reported.
  • From  Jhapa in the east all the way to Darchula in the west (where the Indian military has even set up a permanent base), the pattern of border encroachment is repeated, with forceful displacement, shifting of border markers and appropriation of territory.
  • India has already appropriated some 59,970 hectares of Nepali territory at 54 points in 21 districts.

Indian Fascism

  • India banned the book on the partition by Jaswanth Singh
  • India arrested the PRIME MINISTER of Kashmir in 1953
  • India rejected UN proposals to keep 16000 troops until plebiscite is held.
  • India banned an Indian book on Sikkim called: Smash and Grab (Annexation of Sikkim by India) by author Sunanda Datta Ray
  • India has banned Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International from Kashmir over 20 years.  Recently to AI personnel were allowed into Kashmir.  They are Indians!  Their first course of action was to call Kashmir an integral part of India (a fact disputed by almost all countries in the world… except India).
  • Indian Armed Forces are allowed to arrest non-violent protesters and are slapping them 2 years imprisonment under PSA laws
  • Kashmir is under direct President’s rule since 1990, after the state legislature was dissolved (the federally appointed governor had admitted that the Kashmiri legislature had a history of rigged elections).
  • India also regularly refuses visas for international rights advocates. In 2003, India denied a visa to the head of Amnesty International, Irene Khan
  • A delegation from the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, a congressionally mandated body, was denied Indian visas.
  • The Indian security forces have flouted all norms of civilized conduct. Kashmiri youths have been murdered in cold blood in fake encounters and Kashmiri women of all ages were and are gang-raped in the prescence of their families. International human rights organizations and the international press has been refused entry into the State by the Indian government.
  • Even this horrifying imbalance of 1 soldier for every 6 Kashmiris (majority of whom are old men, women and children) has failed to suppress the freedom movement.
  • Huge chunks of the region come under draconian laws like the Armed Forces Special Protection Act or the Disturbed Areas Act, which have been in place in Manipur, Nagaland and many parts of Assam, thereby covering a significant geographical chunk of Northeast India for more than two decades. These Acts essentially give the security forces a free hand in doing what they please as long as it’s under the guise of “fighting terror”
  • laws was that of the custodial death of Thangjam Manorama in Manipur, where the AFSPA had been enforced for over 25 years. Witnesses say Manorama was picked up on July 11th 2004 by soldiers of the paramilitary Assam Rifles from her home on alleged charges of links with separatist rebels. The next day, her dead body was reportedly found four kilometres away from her home in the state capital Imphal, with multiple bullet wounds and signs of torture. The entire state came to a standstill under the backlash of huge protests following the brutal and tragic death.
  • India did not outlaw hindu practice of forced temple prostitution until 1988.

India foreign Intervention & Sabotage

  • India has supported “Baluchistan liberation army” and related terror outfits.
  • India sent their military to sri lanka and massacred both the Sinhalese and the Tamils in Velvettiturai and Trincomalee
  • India supported the Northern Alliance against the Pashtuns majority but blames Pakistan for interference
  • India financed anti-Pakistan Northern Alliance
  • India imposed an economic blockade on land-locked Nepal in 1989
  • India overtly and covertly supported the insurgency against the state by LTTE, a nationalist Tamil group in the northern Jaffna region of this small island country of Sri Lanka, which kept it politically and economically destabilised for decades
  • In 1971, Elements of the Indian Army looted Bangladesh while the high command let it happen and benefited from the loot.
  • India supported Shanti Bahini insurgency in the Chittagong Hill Tracts according to Bangladesh
  • “Ignoring and reputing Sri Lanka’s sovereign and independent status, and violating all limits of shamelessness, M K Narayanan, India’s National Security Advisor, on May 13, 2007, thundered out like a so-called superpower declaring, “We are the big power in this region. Let us make it very clear. We strongly believe that whatever requirements the Sri Lankan government has, they should come to us. And we will give them what we think is necessary. We do not favour their going to China or Pakistan or any other country
  • Indian conducted military regime-change operations in the Madives

Indian Provocations

  • India started the nuclear arms race in South Asia in 1974 called “peaceful”.
  • The Indian Ambassador to Nepal, Mr. Sood, interfered in the choice of Nepal’s Commander-in-Chief. By doing so, he has made it clear that Nepalese right to choose their government remains a right as long as their choice does not contradict with Indias’ vested interest in Nepal
  • India started the nuclear provocation by testing nuclear weapons on Pakistan’s border in 1998 leaving Pakistan no options to demonstrate her nuclear deterrents.
  • India border forces have killed hundreds of Bangladeshi border guards.
  • India continues to fence the disputed borders with Bangladesh regardless of the Bangladeshi protests.
  • India continues to support the Dalai Lama & Tibet Separatists to instigate the Chinese
  • Indians government warned: “If the Chinese will not vacate the areas occupied by her, India will have to repeat what she did in Goa.  She will certainly drive out the Chinese forces.”   India initiated the Forward Policy setting up checkpoints north of the McMahon line.
  • Bangladesh often finds itself on the receiving end of Indian development projects utilizing the numerous rivers that flow through the country apart from the constructing of Indian fences along the Bangladeshi border to placate Indian xenophobia resulting in ruined commerce interactions and livelihood for villagers on either side of the border

Other

  • India continues to stall resolutions with Bangladesh over river boundaries, hundres of enclaves
  • India forced China into war due its inflexibility with border territories inherited from the British Raj and India’s provocative “forward” policy.
  • Indian governments have refused to sign nuclear testing and nonproliferation agreements — accelerating a nuclear arms race in South Asia. (India’s second nuclear tests in 1998 led to Pakistan’s decision to detonate its own nuclear weapons.)
  • India supported the illegal, immoral and brutal Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.  India did not boycott Moscow Olympics along with other democracies of the world.
  • In 2008, India single-handedly foiled the last Doha round of global trade talks, an effort to nail together a global deal that almost nobody loved, but one that would have benefited developing countries most.”I reject everything,” declared Kamal Nath, then the Indian commerce and industry minister, after grueling days and sleepless nights of negotiations in Geneva in the summer of 2008.

Indian Pogroms & Terror

  • India rampaged through the sacred sikh golden temple, killed sikh leaders and humiliated its followers.
  • India used artillery against its own Sikh people in the religious residential area of Amristar
  • Indian police and para-military stood by idly as 3000+ Sikhs were murdered during the Sikh Riots.
  • India government stood by idly as the destruction of Babri Masjid took place
  • Indian state government of Gujrat headed by Modi committed a state-sponsored pogrom in gujrat killing 2000+ Muslims and displacing 100,000.
  • India has slaughtered 70,000-130,000  civilians in Kashmir
  • Indian forces have raped 9900 women in Kashmir
  • India maintains an army 0f 700,000 soldiers  in Kashmir (50% of its total army and greater than the entire Army of neighboring Pakistan) against the civilian population of that small state which numbers less than 4 million people.
  • India massacred peaceful Kashmiri protests in Gowkadal, Maisuma and Bijbehara
  • human rights organization like Amnesty International and Asia Watch constantly report of indescribably inhumane treatment meted out to Kashmiris in government run torture cells and elsewhere
  • “The Armed Forces (J&K) Special Powers Bill (1990), which have been passed by the parliament of world’s largest “democracy”. This Bill grants authorization to members of Indian Security Forces to “fire upon or otherwise use force, even to the causing of death against any person” without fire orders. 100,000+ people have been brutally murdered by the Indian Security Forces in the past 20 years and thousands more have been intimidated and terrorized

Bangladesh often finds itself on the receiving end of Indian development projects utilizing the numerous rivers that flow through the country apart from the constructing of Indian fences along the Bangladeshi border to placate Indian xenophobia resulting in ruined commerce interactions and livelihood for villagers on either side of the border. Sri Lankans, both Sinhalese and Tamils, have for long spoken of Indian imperialism, alternatively supporting both the Tamil Tigers and the Sri Lankan military, including the brutal Indian Peace Keeping Force sent to the tiny island nation in the 1980s. Indian monopoly capital has made huge inroads into all neighbouring countries in South Asia, resulting in immense resource usurpation. Tinier nations like Nepal, Maldives and Bhutan are essentially forced to act as Indian client states with the Indian military expanding and conducting operations in them as they please

“Northeast India” itself is very much a post-colonial construct, coming into existence only after Indian Independence in 1947, and the region has suffered for a long time under extremely oppressive Indian state hegemony as well as spatial discrimination in comparison to the rest of India

The hegemonic treatment meted out to the region has resulted in numerous armed nationalist and sub-nationalist insurgent movements, causing multiple conflicts with the Indian state as well as internecine battles with each other. This has resulted in harsh material conditions for the people, including human rights abuses, insecure livelihood, difficult working conditions as well as exploitation of the conflict by capital

The discrimination meted out by the Indian state also spawned massive cultural hegemony, and soon many movements, mostly of a cultural-nationalist nature, sprung up in order to counter Indian state-hegemony, as well as to ensure their own rights towards effective self-determination.

While initially non-violent in the 1940s and 50s, from the 1960s onwards many of these movements soon went on to becoming full-blown armed insurgencies, the most prominent ones being ULFA (United Liberation Front of Assam), Manipur Peoples Liberation Army (PLA), NSCN (National Socialist Council of Nagalim) and many others. The region counts around 30 major insurgent outfits along with numerous smaller ones. This has resulted in the longstanding, massive and extremely oppressive presence of the Indian military, in the name of curtailing numerous armed nationalist movements either fighting for independence or greater autonomy

As can be expected in most situations of occupation or state hegemony, the brunt is borne by the working poor. Stories of disappearances, custody killings, encounter killings all conducted by the security forces as well as people caught in the midst of the conflict are all too easy to find.

Many insurgent outfits have had or continue to have training camps or bases in neighbouring countries like Bhutan, Burma, Bangladesh and Nepal.

India has continuously arm-twisted these nations into providing space and support for the Indian military to enter and conduct operations in flushing out insurgents without any concern for local people within those neighbouring countries. Numerous joint military operations have been conducted on India’s behest in each of the nations mentioned, including particularly brutal ones launched in Burmese and Bhutanese territory to kill ULFA militants that also resulted in massive displacement and human rights abuses upon locals in the two countries.

“India very recently bid to set such an example. India unjustifiably rebuked and scared Sri Lanka when she (Sri Lanka) expressed her desire to collect traditional, but effective, radars and other smaller equipments from Pakistan and China due to inability and failure of India-origin radars to detect air attacks of Tamil rebels.”

 

ALL SOURCES TO THE INFO ABOVE IS AVAILABLE.  IF YOU ARE ABLE TO REFUTE ANYTHING BASED ON A RELIABLE SOURCE, THE INFORMATION ABOVE WILL BE RETRACTED.

READERS ARE CHALLENGED AND ENCOURAGED TO PROVE THE ITEMS ABOVE AS FALSE.

June 30, 2010

Pakistan Software Companies List

110 Solutions

360 Technologies (Pvt.) Limited

A2Z Creators Inc.

AA Intelligent Systems

AbacusConsulting

Abacusoft

Access Group

Acrologix Pvt. Ltd.

Actsol (SMC-Pvt) Ltd

AdamSoft International (Pvt) Limited

Advanced Research Projects and Technologies (Pvt) Ltd.

AKSA Solutions Development Services (Pvt) Limited

Alchemy Technologies

Algorithm Consulting (Pvt.) Limited

AMOS

Apvision (Private) Limited

Arwen Tech (Private) Ltd.

ASK Development

AutoSoft Dynamics (Pvt.) Limited

Avanceon

Avanza Solutions (Pvt.) Ltd.

Ayesoft

Bahria Enterprise Systems & Technologies (BEST)

BearingPoint

Bentley Systems Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd.

BITS Software House

Blue Ice Technologies

BrainStorm (Pvt.) Limited

Business Beam Pvt. Ltd

Business Technologies (Pvt) Ltd

CATALYST IT Solutions (Pvt) Ltd

CATCOS, Inc.

Centric Technologies

CIKLUM PAKISTAN (PVT) LIMITED

Cloud BPO Private Limited

Cogilent Solutions

Coherent Designs (Pvt.) Limited

CommTel Soft

CommTel Soft

Corvit Networks

Creative Chaos (Pvt) Ltd.

Crescent Technologies (Pvt.) Limited

CTO 24/7 (Pvt) Ltd

CureMD Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd.

Cybersoft Private Limited

Data Focal Systems Pvt. Ltd.

Digital Research Labs (Pvt) Limited

DPL

eDev Technologies

EDUSYS

Efrotech Services

Elixir Technologies Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd.

Ensign Communique (Pvt) Ltd

Etilize Pakistan

Expert Systems (Pvt.) Limited

Fast Developers

FiveRivers Technologies (Pvt.) Ltd.

Folio3 (Pvt.) Limited

FSD Solutions

Geni Team

GoodCore Software (Pvt) Ltd

Hambra IT

ICE ANIMATIONS (PVT) LIMITED

iEngineering Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd.

Ikonami

Inbox Business Technologies Pvt. Ltd

InfoSpan (Pvt.) Limited

InfoTech. Pvt. Ltd.

Innovations

Innovative (Pvt.) Ltd.

InsigniaSoft

Insoft

Integrated Systems Research (Pvt.) Ltd.

Integrated Technology Partners (Pvt) Ltd.

Intelligentsia Software (Pvt) Ltd

iTACK SOLUTIONS

ITIM Systems (Pvt) Ltd

JGC-Descon Engineering (Pvt) LTD

Jin Technologies (Pvt) Ltd.

Kabot International (Pvt.) Ltd

Kalsoft (Pvt.) Limited

Knowledge Platform

Kolachi Advanced Technologies

Lakson Business Solutions Limited

Leading Edge Solutions (Pvt) Limited

LMKR

LumenSoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Maison Consulting & Solutions

Mantaq Systems

Marriala Consulting (Pvt) Ltd

Matora Digionics (Pvt) Ltd.

Mcomm (Pvt) Ltd

Millennium Software (pvt) ltd

Millennium Systems & Consultants (Pvt.) Ltd.

Mindshare Solutions

MIXIT Technologies (Pvt) Ltd

Naseeb Online Services (Pvt) Ltd

NC Inc.

NDC – BPO

Netpace Systems

Netsol Technologies Limited

New Horizon Computers

OASystems Pvt Ltd.

Ora-Tech Systems (Pvt.) Ltd.

Ovex Technologies (Pvt.) Ltd.

Ovex Technologies Pakistan (Pvt) Limited

Pakistan Revenue Automation (Pvt.) Ltd.

Palmchip Pakistan (Pvt.) Limited

PIBAS Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd.

PixSense (Pvt.) Ltd.

Plumsmedia

Premier Software

Prislogix

RIKSOF

Sabri Technologies

Sapphire Consulting Services Pvt. Ltd.

Sepia Solutions

Server4Sale

Si3 -System Innovations (Pvt.) Limited

Sidat Hyder Morshed Associates (Pvt.) Ltd.

Siemens Pakistan Engineering Co. Ltd.

Smart Solutions

Sofcom (Private) Limited

Sofizar (Pvt.) Ltd.

Softech Microsystems

Softech Systems (Pvt) Ltd.

Softech Worldwide

Strategic Systems International

Super Technologies (Pvt.) Ltd.

SuperNova Solutions

Sybertek

Sybrid (Pvt.) Ltd

Synergy Computers (Pvt.) Ltd.

Sysnet Pakistan Pvt. Ltd.

Systems Limited

Target Systems

Techaccess Pakistan Pvt. Ltd.

Techlogix Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd.

TECHSENSE (Pvt) Limited

TEKenable (Pvt) Ltd.

TENPEARLS INTERNATIONAL

Teralight Limited

THK Solutions

TkXel

Touchstone

TPS Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd.

TRG (Pvt) Limited

Trillium Information Security Systems

True Meridian (Pvt.) Limited

Ultimus Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd.

VectraCom (Pvt) Ltd.

Volmax (Pvt) Ltd.

VOPIUM A/S Pvt. Ltd.

WallSoft

Webiz Media (Pvt) Ltd

Xavor Pakistan

ZRG International

June 30, 2010

China and Chinese Province called Taiwan complete historic trade pact

FROM www.npr.org

A historic trade deal between China and Taiwan will ease 60 years of hostility and push their economies closer than ever, the latest sign that Beijing’s strategy of wooing the self-ruled island with carrots instead of sticks is paying off.

At the signing of the deal in the Chinese city of Chonqquing on Tuesday, negotiators on both sides spoke of a new era in ties across the Taiwan Strait — where the threat of military conflict has lingered since Taiwan and China split amid civil war in 1949.

Bilateral trade already totals $110 billion annually, and the pact aims to boost it further by slashing tariffs on a wide range of products. Taiwanese businesses are among the most eager to invest on the mainland, which the pact will promote by formalizing mechanisms for dispute mediation and promising access to new sectors such as banking and insurance.

“This is a critical moment in the development of long-term relations. We should seize the opportunity to work together and build mutual trust,” Chiang Pin-kung, chairman of Taiwan’s semiofficial Straits Exchange Foundation, said ahead of the signing.

His Beijing counterpart, Chen Yunlin, called it an agreement of “equal consultation and mutual benefits.”

The nuts and bolts of the pact, formally known as the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, resemble a deal China hammered out recently with a bloc of trade partners in Southeast Asia, but with added political resonance. It reflects Beijing’s commitment to improving ties with Taiwan and signals a softening of the mainland’s stance toward the island of 23 million.

Chinese President Hu Jintao has sought to move beyond the threatening rhetoric that long characterized Beijing’s response to Taiwan’s refusal to unify with the mainland. His government has talked of ending the state of hostility with Taiwan and negotiating a peace treaty.

“For Taiwan, this is purely an economic deal, while for China, this is a political move,” said Kao Huei at the National Kinmen Institute of Technology in Taiwan. “Mainland China now sees cross-strait relations at a stage of peaceful development, and the signing of ECFA fits into that narrative. In the long term, what China wants to achieve with peaceful development is peaceful unification with Taiwan.”

For decades, relations have been strained and the 100-mile-wide Taiwan Strait remains a potential military flash point. China has 1,300 missiles aimed at Taiwanese targets and, while Taiwan has cut its defense budget as a proportion of GDP in the last two years, it retains a relatively well-equipped air force.

But in the last two years, the sides have tried to build trust by resuming regular air and sea links after a hiatus of 60 years and ending across-the-board restrictions on Chinese investment in Taiwan.

Chao Chun-shan, a political science professor of Taipei’s Tamkang University, said the trade deal should do even more to bind the two sides together and could help cool military tensions.

“If Taiwanese gain the benefits from trading with the mainland, they will let down their guard and the two sides could move on to more sensitive topics, such as a diplomatic truce, military trust or peace treaty,” Chao said.

For Taiwan President Ma Ying-jeou, the deal is the centerpiece of a campaign of rapprochement he has helped engineer since taking office in May 2008. Ma argues that a trade deal with China is necessary to prevent Taiwan’s economic marginalization amid growing commercial ties between Beijing and neighboring Asian countries. But he is under pressure to prove his strategy is working to Taiwan’s boisterous democracy and a divided public skeptical about Beijing’s intentions.

More than 30,000 Taiwanese protested the deal in the capital Taipei over the weekend. Taiwan’s opposition Democratic Progressive Party have criticized Ma for proceeding without enough public input and rejecting calls for a public referendum on the agreement.

Still, polls show a majority of Taiwanese support the deal because of the economic boost it promises – although most on the island still prefer self-rule.

The agreement is expected to be easily approved by Taiwan’s legislature — possibly as early as next month — because Ma’s ruling Nationalist Party holds a majority of the seats.

Analysts expect it will boost Taiwan’s GDP – but the more significant returns may be political.

“It means the two sides will be more cautious should there be any tensions or friction,” said Tang Yonghong, an expert on cross-strait economic and trade relations at Xiamen University in south China’s Fujian province. “They will be more reluctant to sacrifice cross-strait trade and stage a war.”

June 30, 2010

Anti-Muslim Pogroms in India

People only speak of Gujrat riots but what about all the other anti-muslim riots in India?

1961: October: Aligarh
1962: Jabalpur (MP)
1964: Bhivandi(Maharashtra)
1967: Ranchi(Bihar)
1969: Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

1970: Bhiwandi, Jalgaon, Malad (Maharashtra)
1971: Aligarh
1978: October : Aligarh
1978-1980: Jamshedpur (Bihar), Varanasi (UP)

1980: Moradabad (UP)
1981: Meenakshipuram, Biharsharif, May-June: Aligarh.
1982: Meerut(UP)
1983: Nellie (Assam), 2191 people killed.
“The six-hour carnage in Nellie claimed 3,300 innocent lives.”
“The Muslim immigrants of Nellie were attacked by the Tiwa ribals on February 18.”
“Even after 24 years, the government has not made publice the T. D. Tewari Commission report of 1994. All the relatives of the Nellie victims received was a paltry Rs. 5,000 each. The survivors were compensated with Rs. 2,000…”
“The records at the Jagir Road police station show that 688 cases were filed agains the murderers. But only 310 were charge sheeted. The remaining 378 cases were closed because of lack of evidence.” [India Today, 13 Aug 2007]

1983: Bhatkal (Karnataka)
1986: April: Newada(Bihar): more than 40 killed.
1987: Meerut(UP)
1989: Bhagalpur(Bihar)

Data released by the Ministry of Home shows that prior to Babri Masjid demolition, the percentage of Muslim victims in the riots had been 80%. [MG 1-15 Nov 2005]

1990-91 : Dec.- Jan. : Aligarh
1992-1993: Bombay, Surat, Ahmedabad, Kanpur, Delhi and rest of the India

  • In Bombay Riots:
  • Killed: 872
  • Injured: 1829
  • Missing: 443
  • (govt figure submitted to the Srikrishna Commission)
  • 1997: Coimbatore

    2000: Report by Asghar Ali Engineer
    2001: Kanpur, Malegaon
    Report by Asghar Ali Engineer
    2002: Gujarat
    In the post-Godhra riots of 2002: 254 Hindus and 790 Muslims were killed in Gujarat. A total of 223 persons have been reported missing, 2548 persons sustained injuries, 919 persons were rendered widows and 606 children were orphaned during the riots.

    http://164.100.24.219/rsq/quest.asp?qref=100652

    2003:

    711 communal incidents, 193 killed, 2261 injured.

    2004: Report by Asghar Ali Engineer

    677 communal incidents, 134 killed, 2132 injured

    2005: Mau (UP); Report by Saanjhi Duniya, Second Report by Saanjhi Duniya, Report by Subhashini Ali.

    779 communal incidents, 124 killed, 2066 injured.

    2006: Goa, Vadodra(Gujarat), May: Aligarh(UP)
    Communal riots 2006 : Asghar Ali Engineer

    698 communal incidents, 133 killed, 3170 injured.

    2007:

    till first quarter of 2007: 191 communal incidents, 23 killed, 611 injured. [Status paper on Internal Security Situatio by Union Ministry of Home Affairs]

    Since 1940, 75 per cent of the causalities – in terms of lives and property destroyed during riots have been of Muslims.
    (Source: Riots and its Aftermath by Shashank Shekhar)

    EMPLOYMENT

    Employment

    Submitted by kashif on Fri, 12/16/2005 – 02:40.

    MUSLIM RATIO ACCROSS STATES (National Crime Record Bureau report)
    West Bengal — Muslims are 25.25%, in police force 7.32%
    Assam — Muslims are 30.92 % , in police force: 10.95%
    Bihar — Muslims are 16.53% , in police force: 5.94%
    Kerala Muslims population: 24.7%, in police force 12.96%
    Karnataka — Muslims’ population: 12.23% , in the police force: 6.71%
    J&K — Muslims population: 66.94% , in the police force: 56.36%
    Gujarat — Muslims’ population: 9.06% , in the police force: 5.94%
    Maharashtra — Muslims’ population: 10.60%, in police force: 4.71%
    Uttar Pradesh — Muslims’ population: 18.50%, in police force: 4.24%
    Tamil Nadu — Muslims’ population: 5.56%, in police force 0.11%

    Statement showing State Wise Disbursements of NMDFC for 2004-05, 2005-06 and 2006-07

    (Rs. in lakhs)

    S.No. State 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07
    1. Andhra Pradesh 928 854 757
    2. Assam 34 310 100
    3. Bihar 811 1 305
    4. Chandigarh 6 5 3
    5. Chhattisgarh 50 0 100
    6. Delhi 100 11 5
    7. Gujarat 100 0 295
    8. Himachal Pradesh 150 150 115
    9. Haryana 275 350 415
    10. Jammu & Kashmir 366 300 370
    11. Jharkhand 100 109 7
    12. Kerala 2180 2000 3275
    13. Karnataka 1243 550 0
    14. Maharashtra 1025 0 75
    15. Manipur 0 0 0
    16. Madhya Pradesh 235 0 0
    17. Mizoram 0 0 200
    18. Nagaland 430 850 500
    19. Orissa 99 115 5
    20. Pondicherry 10 5 10
    21. Punjab 350 500 525
    22. Rajasthan 181 105 155
    23. Tamil Nadu 325 655 952
    24. Tripura 50 5 25
    25. Uttar Pradesh 1983 1118 0
    26. Uttranchal 5 309 265
    27. West Bengal 2867 2510 2818
    TOTAL 13903 10812 11277

    Rajya Sabha, 2007

    Muslims in Govt. jobs

    Muslims in security agencies like CRPF, CISF, BSF, SSB: 60517

    In the Indian Foreign Service: 1.8% of the total.

    In central and State Public Sector undertakings: 7.2% of the employees for the units reporting.

    [Rajya Sabha 2007]

    Employment status of Hindu and Muslim women

    Class Employed Not employed Total
    All Muslim women 2280 (16.47%) 11563 (83.53%) 13843 (100%)
    All Hindu women 37565 (36.48%) 65402 (63.52%) 102967 (100%)
    By residence
    Rural Muslim 1236 (17.68%) 5759 (82.32%) 6995 (100%)
    Rural Hindu 27141 (41.28%) 38606 (58.72%) 65747 (100%)
    Urban Muslim 970 (14.17%) 5878 (85.83%) 6848 (100%)
    Urban Hindu 7852 (21.10%) 29368 (78.90%) 37220 (100%)
    By education
    Muslim uneducated 1447 (18.03%) 6581 (81.97%) 8028 (100%)
    Hindu uneducated 24434 (44.01%) 31082 (55.99%) 55516 (100%)
    Muslim primary educated 450 (13.59%) 2865 (86.41%) 3315 (100%)
    Hindu primary educated 5505 (27.75%) 14328 (72.25%) 19833 (100%)
    Muslim post-primary 327 (13.06%) 2173 (86.94%) 2500 (100%)
    Hindu post-primary 5169 (18.72%) 22449 (81.28%) 27618 (100%)
    By region
    Muslim North 170 (21.51%) 621 (78.49%) 791 (100%)
    Hindu North 4062 (30.06%) 9452 (69.94%) 13514 (100%)
    Muslim Central 633 (13.94%) 3909 (86.06%) 4542 (100%)
    Hindu Central 8911 (29.07%) 21739 (70.93%) 30650 (100%)
    Muslim East 159 (8.98%) 1607 (91.02%) 1766 (100%)
    Hindu East 2787 (22.62%) 9535 (77.38%) 12322 (100%)
    Muslim South 943 (25.03%) 2824 (74.97%) 3767 (100%)
    Hindu South 12323 (51.42%) 11642 (48.58%) 23965 (100%)
    Muslim West 353 (22.56%) 1212 (77.44%) 1565 (100%)
    Hindu West 6802 (46.79%) 7737 (53.21%) 14539 (100%)
    Muslim NE 101 (7.16%) 1311 (92.84%) 1412 (100%)
    Hindu NE 1364 (17.10%) 6613 (82.90%) 7977 (100%)
    Count (percent) Source: National Sample Survey 50th round, 1993-94

    Maitreyi Bordia Das, Self-employed or Unemployed: Muslim Women’s Low Labor-force Participitain in India. Published as a chapter in The Diversity of Muslim women’s lives in India edited by Zoya Hasan and Ritu Menon.
    North = Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan, Chandigarh, Delhi.
    East = West Bengal, Orissa, Andaman & Nicobar Islands.
    West = Gujarat, Maharashtra, Goa, Dadra & Nagar Haveli, Daman & Diu.
    South = Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Lakshwadeep, Pondicherry.
    NE = Manipur, Tripura, Arunachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland.
    Central = Bihar(including Jharkhand), Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh.

    By employment categories
    Categories Muslim Hindu
    Regular salaried 179 (8.66%) 2471 (7.62%)
    Non-farm self-employed 645 (39.80%) 3223 (9.94%)
    Farm based self-employed 457 (22.08%) 12540 (56.25%)
    Casual labor 789 (38.12%) 14181 (43.75%)
    Total 2070 (100%) 32415 (100%)
    Major occupations (>2%)
    Teachers 2.76% 2.35
    Merchants, shopkeepers(wholesale, retail) 5.18% 1.98%
    Working proprietors in mining, construction, manufacturing 2.00% 0.66%
    Tailors, dressmakers, etc. 5.07% 1.03%
    Agricultural laborers 25.69% 37.59%
    Spinners, weavers, and related workers 7.08% 1.56%
    Other laborers 2.57% 1.44%
    Tobacco product makers 11.40% 1.51%
    Other farmers 4.12% 3.56%
    Cultivators 17.55% 34.40%
    Building caretakers, sweepers, cleaners 4.01% 1.72%
    Count (percent) Source: National Sample Survey 50th round, 1993-94 and the National Classification of Occupation, 1968

    In Kerala Population of Muslims: 24.7% Muslims in Government jobs: 9.88%

    Indian Armed Forces

    Year Indian Military Academy Naval Academy Air Force Academy
    2005 4/347 0/90 0/110
    2004 6/330 0/79 4/175
    no. of muslims/total qualified

    All India Services Percentage to the total in brackets)

    Name of services Total No. of Officers No. of Muslims No. of Christians No. of Sikhs
    IAS 3975 128(3.22) 109(2.74) 165(4.15)
    IPS 2159 57(2.64) 49(2.26) 117(5.41)
    IFS 1433 45(3.14) 23(1.60) 44(3.07)
    Total 7567 230(3.04) 181(2.39) 326(4.31)

    (Source: Dr. Gopal Singh Report on Minorities, 1983, p.33)

    Indian Administrative service(Percentage to the total in brackets)

    Year Total Intake Muslims Sikhs Christians
    1971 87 1 (1.14) 4(4.59) 5(5.74)
    1972 142 1 (0.70) 6(4.85) 4(2.81)
    1973 124 3 (2.41) 5(4.03) 7(5.64)
    1974 141 1 (0.70) 9(6.38) 4(2.83)
    1975 129 2 (1.55) 5(3.87) 7(5.42)
    1976 138 5 (3.62) 9(6.52) 10(7.24)
    1977 158 10(6.32) 4(2.53) 13(8.22)
    1978 134 10(7.46) 6(4.47) 13(9.70)
    1979 117 3 (2.56) 8(6.83) 7(5.98)
    1980 124 1 (0.80) 5(4.03) 3(2.41)
    Total 1294 37(2.86) 61(4.71) 73(5.64

    (Source: Dr. Gopal Singh Report on Minorities, 1983, p.31).

    Indian Police Services (Percentage to the total brackets)

    Year Total Intake Muslim Sikhs Christians
    1971 35
    1972 59 3(5.08)
    1973 116 1(0.86) 1(0.86)
    1974 75 5(6.66) 12(16.0) 3(4.00)
    1975 65 12(18.5) 3(4.61)
    1976 92 3(3.26) 2(2.17)
    1977 212 6(2.83) 3(1.41) 4(1.88)
    1978 45 2(2.22) 2(4.44) 3(6.66)
    1979 50 2(4.00) 5(10.00) 1(2.00)
    Total 749 15(2.00) 40(5.34) 17(2.27)

    (Source: Dr. Gopal Singh report on Minorities, 1983, p.31)

    Muslims in Indian Administrative Services since 1981

    Year Total Muslims Percentage
    1981 126 1 0.79
    1982 167 5 2.99
    1983 235 1 0.43
    1984 233 6 2.58
    1985 214 4 1.87
    1986 216 6 2.78
    1987 178 5 2.81
    1988 249 15 6.02
    1989 246 13 5.28
    1990 298 9 3.02
    1991 217 8 3.69
    1992 157 3 1.91
    1993 147 2 1.36
    1994 131 2 1.53
    1995 91 8 8.79
    1996 81 3 3.70
    1997 76 3 3.95
    1998 55 1 1.82
    1999 56 2 3.57
    2000 93 6 6.45
    Total 3266 103 3.15

    (Source: Muslim India, No.238, October, 2002, p.462)

    Subordinate Services (Central Government)

    Religion % to population No. & % of Applicants No. & %of successful candidates
    Muslims 11.21 5336(2.59) 83(1.56)
    Christians 2.60 9502(4.61) 366(3.85)
    Sikh 1.89 3643(1.77) 90(2.47)

    (Source: Dr. Gopal Singh report on Minorities, 1983, p.33)

    Employment for Muslims

    Govt. services: 3%

    Private sector: 5.3%

    Domestic jobs: 23.5%

    Part-time labourers: 17%

    Skilled labourers: 14.2%

    Small business: 7%

    [MG 1-15 Feb 2006]

    Representation of Muslims:

    Class I services: 3.2%

    Class II services: 4.3%

    Class IV services: 8%

    IAS: 2.1% IPS: 3% ( 1984 data)

    High court judges: 14 out of 310 ( year 1980)

    [as quoted in MG 16-30 november 2005]

    Muslims in :

    Private sector: 8.16%

    Borrowers under bank loan schemes: 9.41% Of the total borrowings: 3.37% [Gopal Singh Commission report]

    June 30, 2010

    Petreus working with Pakistan strategy

    www.dawn.com

    WASHINGTON: Pakistan’s involvement in a reconciliation agreement in Afghanistan is essential and the United States needs to further this developing partnership between the two neighbouring countries, Gen David Petraeus told his confirmation hearing on Tuesday.

    But the new US commander for Afghanistan also told the Senate Armed Services Committee that Afghan President Hamid Karzai had denied reports that he recently met a top leader of anti-Kabul network, Sirajuddin Haqqani.

    “Pakistani involvement in some form of reconciliation agreement, I think that that is essential,” Gen Petraeus told the committee’s chairman Senator Carl Levin.

    Senator Levin wanted the general to comment on recent media reports that Pakistani officials had approached the Karzai government with a proposal that includes delivering the Haqqani network, which US believes runs a major part of the insurgency in Afghanistan and is an ally of Al Qaeda, into a power-sharing arrangement.

    “Clearly, we want to forge a partnership or further the partnership that has been developing between Afghanistan and Pakistan. Those countries are always going to be neighbours. And helping them develop a constructive relationship would be an important contribution,” the general said.

    But he also warned not to expect these recent contacts between Pakistan and Afghanistan to lead to an immediate reconciliation between the Afghan government and the Taliban insurgents.

    “Now, whether that is possible, such an agreement, I think is going to depend on a number of factors that will play out over the course of the summer, including creating a sense among the Taliban that they are going to get hammered in the field and perhaps should look at some options,” said the general.

    On Sunday, both President Barack Obama and CIA Director Leon Panetta also expressed scepticism about the likelihood that Taliban leaders would accept a proposal for reconciliation.

    But President Obama also noted that the attempt to draw Afghanistan and Pakistan into a closer partnership was a useful step.

    When the senator asked Gen Petraeus if he knew about a reported meeting between President Karzai and Sirajuddin Haqqani, Gen Petraeus said Mr Karzai denied meeting any leader of the Haqqani Network.

    “In talking to President Karzai in the vehicle on the way over here, he assured me that he has not met a Haqqani group leader, by the way in recent days or, I think, at any time,” the general said.

    On Saturday, Al Jazeera reported that President Karzai recently met Mr Haqqani to discuss a power-sharing agreement. The meeting was reportedly orchestrated by Pakistani intelligence and army officials, who want the Haqqani Network to be included in a new set-up in Afghanistan.

    Dawn, however, reported on June 15 that Pakistani officials were indeed trying to broker a deal between the Afghan government and the Haqqanis, although the sources who spoke to Dawn did not confirm a meeting between President Karzai and Mr Haqqani.

    US intelligence officials who spoke to the media noted that President Karzai would have little incentive to admit that such a meeting took place, if in fact it did. But they also cast doubt on the Al Jazeera report.

    These officials, however, do not dispute press reports and say that the Pakistanis are attempting to broker a deal between the Haqqanis and the Afghan government. Instead, they disputed the notion that Mr Karzai could have had a face-to-face meeting with Mr Haqqani. One senior intelligence official pointed to Mr Karzai’s heavy American security detail as an obstacle to such a meeting.

    Gen Petraeus noted that in recent past lower and mid-level Taliban leaders had indeed sought to reintegrate with the Afghan government and there had been “more in recent days, small numbers here and there”.

    The general said that the reintegration decree that President Karzai approved on Tuesday would help codify this process.
    “But whether or not very senior leaders can meet the very clear conditions that the Afghan government has laid down for reconciliation, I think, is somewhat in question. So in that regard, I agree with Director Panetta,” he said.

    When Senator John McCain, the ranking Republican on the committee, asked Mr Petraeus if he was concerned that the ISI continued to work with the Haqqani and other Taliban groups, the general said it was difficult to give a categorical answer to this question.

    “What we have to always figure out with Pakistan is: are they working with the Taliban to support the Taliban or to recruit sources in the Taliban? And that’s the difficulty, frankly, in trying to assess what the ISI is doing in some of their activities in Fata, in contacts with the Haqqani network, or the Afghan Taliban,” he said.

    “There are no questions about the longstanding lengths. Let’s remember that we funded the ISI to build these organisations when they were the Mujahideen and helping to expel the Soviets from Afghanistan,” he added.

    “And so certainly, residual links would not be a surprise. The question is what the character of those links is and what the activities are behind them.

    June 30, 2010

    Pakistan biggest companies

    Food: Seri Sugar Mills Ltd.,
    Banking: National Bank of Pakistan, United Bank Ltd.,
    Energy & water: Fauji Kabirwala, Hub River, Hubco, Kot Addu, Pakistan State Oil, Tapal Energy, Uch,
    Equipment: Pakistan National Shipping Corp,
    State: Public institution,
    Telecommunications services: Paktel,
    Financial services: National Investment Trust,
    Tobacco: Lakson Stake,
    Apparel: Kohinoor,
    June 30, 2010

    Pakistan one of the leaders of the Islamic World – Organization of Islamic Countries (OIC)

    Introduction

    The Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) is an inter-governmental organization grouping fifty-six States. These States decided to pool their resources together, combine their efforts and speak with one voice to safeguard the interest and ensure the progress and well-being of their peoples and those of other Muslims in the world over.

    The Organization was established in Rabat, Kingdom of Morocco, on 12 Rajab 1389H (25 September 1969) when the First meeting of the leaders of the Islamic world was held in this city in the wake of the criminal arson perpetrated on 21 August 1969 by Zionist elements against Al-Aqsa Mosque, in occupied Jerusalem. It was indeed in order to defend the honour, dignity and faith of the Muslims, to face this bitter challenge launched in the holy city of Al-Quds so dear to them and against the Mosque of Al-Aqsa, the first Qibla and third holiest Shrine of Islam, that the leaders of the Muslim world, at their Summit in Rabat, seized that event – which brought about unanimous worldwide condemnation and reprobation – to think together of their common cause and muster the force required to overcome their differences, unite and lay the foundations of this large grouping of States, that is, the Organization of the Islamic Conference which they entrusted, in absolute priority, with liberating Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa from Zionist occupation.

    Six months after that historical meeting, i.e. in Muharram 1390H (March 1970), the First Islamic Conference of Ministers of Foreign Affairs held in Jeddah set up a permanent General Secretariat, to ensure a liaison among Member States and charged it to coordinate their action. The Conference appointed its Secretary General and chose Jeddah as the Headquarters of the Organization, pending the liberation of Jerusalem, which would be the permanent Headquarters.

    Two and a half years after Rabat, in Muharram 1392H (February 1972), the Islamic Conference of Foreign Ministers, meeting in its Third Session, adopted the Charter of the Organization, whose purpose is to strengthen solidarity and cooperation among Islamic States in the political, economic, cultural, scientific and social fields.

    Under the Charter, the Organization aims to:

    1. Strengthen:

    a) Islamic solidarity among Member States;
    b) Cooperation in the political, economic, social, cultural and scientific fields:
    c) The struggle of all Muslim people to safeguard their dignity, independence and national rights.

    2. Coordinate action to:

    a) Safeguard the Holy Places;
    b) Support the struggle of the Palestinian people and assist them in recovering their rights and liberating their occupied territories.

    3. Work to:

    a) Eliminate racial discrimination and all forms of colonialism;
    b) Create a favorable atmosphere for the promotion of cooperation and understanding between Member States and other countries.

    The Charter also enumerates principles which OIC Member States undertake to inspire themselves from, in order to achieve the objectives of the Organization.

    The Charter also enumerates the principles governing OIC activities, namely:

    1. Full equality among Member States
    2.Observation of the right to self determination and non-interference in the internal affairs of Member States
    3. Observation of the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of each State
    4.The settlement of any dispute that might arise among Member States by peaceful means such as negotiations, mediation, conciliation and arbitration
    5. A pledge to refrain, in relations among Member States, from resorting to force or threatening to resort to the use of force against the unity and territorial integrity or the political independence of any one of them

    In order to achieve its objectives, the Organization has main bodies, secondary organs, institutions and specialized committees.

    The Islamic Conference is composed of the following main bodies

    The Conference of Kings and Heads of State and Government, is the supreme authority of the Organization which meets once every three years to lay down the Organization’s policy

    The Conference of Foreign Ministers, which meets once a year to examine a progress report on the implementation of its decisions taken within the framework of the policy defined by the Islamic Summit

    The General Secretariat, which is the executive organ of the Organization, entrusted with the implementation of the decisions of the two preceding bodies.

    In order to coordinate and boost its action, align its view points and stands, and be credited with concrete results in the various fields of cooperation: political, economic, cultural, social, spiritual and scientific, among Member States, the Organization has created different committees, nearly all, at ministerial level, a number of which are chaired by Heads of State. The Al-Quds Committee, the Standing Committee for Information and Cultural Affairs (COMIAC), the Standing Committee for Economic and Trade Cooperation (COMCEC), the Standing Committee for Scientific and Technical Cooperation (COMSTECH) and the Islamic Peace Committee are the ones Chaired by Heads of State. Fourteen Committees which have been thus established, deal with other important issues such as Palestine, the Sahel, Afghanistan, Kashmir etc.

    The number and types of secondary organs and institutions, working toward the achievement of the OIC objectives, have been steadily increasing, and cover various areas of cultural, scientific, economic, legal, financial, sports, technological, educational, media, as well as vocational, social and humanitarian. Depending on their degree of autonomy vis-a-vis the parent organization, they are classified as subsidiary and specialized organs, or affiliated institutions.

    Last but not least, it is worth mentioning that by the 3rd year of the World Decade for Cultural Development launched by the United Nations in 1988 under the auspices of UNESCO – the Organization of the Islamic Conference had built Islamic Colleges, and Cultural Institutes and Centres to spread Islamic culture and dispense the Teaching of Arabic, the language of the Holy Qur’an, as well as other languages.

    Pakistan’s Role In the OIC

    Pakistan with its legacy rooted in the Islamic faith and its consistent support for Muslim causes, as well as in response to the overwhelming public support for the cause of liberation of Al-Quds Al-Sharif, was a founding member of the OIC in 1969.

    Relations with the Islamic world are the corner stone of foreign policy of Pakistan. As a founding member of the OIC Pakistan has an abiding commitment to the purposes, principles and objectives of its Charter. Pakistan has played an important role in strengthening cooperation among Muslim States by its active participation in the programmes and activities of the OIC. The efforts by Pakistan have received due acknowledgment in the OIC signified by its membership of all key OIC’s Specialized Committees and Contact Groups on critical issues of the Islamic world – Palestine, Afghanistan, Jammu & Kashmir, Bosnia, Kosovo and Sahel.

    Pakistan is the Chairman of the OIC Standing Committee on Scientific and Technological Cooperation (COMSTECH) which has its Headquarters in Islamabad. Pakistan also host the Secretariat of the Islamic Chamber of Commerce and Industry( ICCI). The Office of the OIC’s Secretary General’s Special Representative on Afghanistan is based in Islamabad.

    The Headquarters of the Islamic Telecommunication Union would also be established in Islamabad. Pakistan is the Chairman of the Council and the Executive Committee of the Parliamentary Union of the OIC Member States (PUOICM).

    Mr. Sharif-ud-Din Pirzada a noted Lawyer and a former Foreign Minister of Pakistan served as the Secretary General of the OIC from 1984 to 1988 . Pakistan is a member of all OIC subsidiary, affiliated and specialized Organs.

    Pakistan hosted the second Islamic Summit Conference in Lahore on 22nd to 24th February 1974. Pakistan also hosted the Second Conference of the OIC Foreign Ministers (ICFM) held in Karachi from 26th to 28 December 1970, Eleventh ICFM in Islamabad from 17th to 22nd May 1980 and the Twenty-first ICFM held in Karachi on 25th to 29th April 1993. The Special Sessions of the OIC Foreign Ministers Conference in 1980 and in 1994 were also held in Pakistan.

    To commemorate Fifty years of the Independence of Pakistan an Extra-ordinary Session of the Islamic Summit was held in Islamabad on 23rd March 1997. A large number of the Islamic Heads of State and Government, in a grand gesture of solidarity with Pakistan attended the Summit meeting and conveyed their full support to the sovereignty, political independence and territorial integrity of Pakistan on this auspicious occasion.

    June 30, 2010

    Top companies of the Muslim World from http://www.DinarStandard.com

    Please be sure to read clarification from Tawhid in the Comment Section. 

    COMPANY

    RANK COUNTRY REVENUE 2007* US$ (mln) TYPE INDUSTRY % REV. GROWTH* ’06-’07
    Saudi Arabian Oil Co. (Saudi Aramco)1 1 Saudi Arabia $     215,985 Government Oil & Gas – Integrated 8%
    National Iranian Oil Company1 2 Iran $     101,631 Government Oil & Gas – Integrated 12%
    Petroliam Nasional Bhd. (Petronas) 3 Malaysia $      66,215 Government Oil & Gas – Integrated 30%
    Kuwait Petroleum Corp.1 4 Kuwait $      64,913 Government Oil & Gas – Integrated 9%
    Iraq National Oil Co.1 5 Iraq $      55,060 Government Oil & Gas – Integrated 22%
    Koc Holding A.S. 6 Turkey $      39,500 Listed Diversified – Automotive, Energy, Finance, Other 14%
    Abu Dhabi National Oil Co.1 7 UAE $      38,789 Government Oil & Gas – Integrated 26%
    Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (SABIC) 8 Saudi Arabia $      33,659 Listed Chemical Manufacturing 46%
    Sonatrach 9 Algeria $      32,211 Government Oil & Gas – Integrated 13%
    Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation1 10 Nigeria $      30,738 Government Oil & Gas – Integrated 3%
    National Oil Company (NOC)1 11 Libya $      30,478 Government Oil & Gas – Integrated 6%
    Syrian Petroleum Company1 12 Syria $      22,200 Government Oil & Gas – Integrated -9%
    Qatar Petroleum1 13 Qatar $      21,313 Government Oil & Gas – Integrated 19%
    Pt Pertamina (Persero)1 14 Indonesia $      21,119 Government Oil & Gas – Integrated -2%
    Socar (State Oil Co. Of The Azerbaijan Republic)1 15 Azerbaijan $      19,694 Government Oil & Gas – Integrated 19%
    Petroleum Development Oman (PDO) 1 16 Oman $      15,330 Government Oil & Gas – Integrated 1%
    Egyptian General Petroleum Co. (EGPC)1 17 Egypt $      13,394 Government Oil & Gas – Integrated 13%
    Sabanci Holding 18 Turkey $      11,890 Private Diversified –  Finance, Retail, Comm., Other 14%
    Kazmunaygas Exploration And Production 19 Kazakhstan $      11,709 Government Oil & Gas – Integrated 24%
    The Emirates Group 20 UAE $      11,204 Government Airline 32%
    Perusahaan Listrik Negara, Pt 21 Indonesia $      10,070 Government Electric Utilities 9%
    Sime Darby Bhd 22 Malaysia $        9,553 Listed Diversified –  Plantations, Heavy equipment, Auto, other 21%
    Saudi Telecom Company 23 Saudi Arabia $        9,199 Listed Telecommunications 2%
    Iran Khodro Plc1 24 Iran $        8,902 Listed Auto & Truck Manufacturing 10%
    Ulker 25 Turkey $        8,500 Listed Food Processing 13%
    Saudi Oger Company2 26 Saudi Arabia $        8,000 Private Construction Services
    Iranian Mining Industries (IMIDRO) 27 Iran $        7,500 Government Mining and Manufacturing 39%
    Ziraat Bank 28 Turkey $        7,452 Government Commercial Banking 17%
    Pakistan State Oil Company Ltd. 29 Pakistan $        7,353 Listed Oil & Gas Operations 41%
    Isbank 30 Turkey $        7,334 Listed Commercial Banking 27%
    Tenaga Nasional Bhd 31 Malaysia $        7,253 Listed Electric Utilities 10%
    Astra International 32 Indonesia $        6,396 Listed Diversified – Auto, Finance, Other 26%
    Dogan Holding 33 Turkey $        6,381 Listed Diversified – Finance, Energy, Media, Other -14%
    Turkcell 34 Turkey $        6,328 Listed Telecommunications 35%
    Akbank Tas 35 Turkey $        6,165 Listed Commercial Banking 26%
    (Zain) Mobile Telecommunications Co. 36 Kuwait $        5,912 Listed Telecommunications 32%
    Agility 37 Kuwait $        5,895 Listed General Freight Trucking 26%
    Emirates Telecom (Etisalat) 38 UAE $        5,810 Listed Telecommunications 31%
    The Lion Group 39 Malaysia $        5,658 Listed Diversified – Steel, Retail, Agriculture, Other 22%
    Saudi Electric Company 40 Saudi Arabia $        5,594 Listed Electric Utilities 6%
    Telkom Indonesia 41 Indonesia $        5,403 Government Telecommunications 16%
    Saipa Corporation 42 Iran $        5,318 Government Auto & Truck Manufacturing 26%
    Enka Holdings Yatrim As 43 Turkey $        5,283 Listed Construction Services 31%
    Kazakhmys 44 Kazakhstan $        5,256 Listed Metal Mining 4%
    Dallah Albaraka Group2 45 Saudi Arabia $        5,204 Private Diversified – Finance, Media, Other -
    M.A. Kharafi & Sons2 46 Kuwait $        5,021 Private Diversified – Engineering, Construction, other -
    Telekom Malaysia Bhd 47 Malaysia $        5,007 Listed Telecommunications 9%
    Saudi Binladin Group2 48 Saudi Arabia $        5,000 Private Construction Services, Telecom & Mining -
    Emaar Properties 49 UAE $        4,773 Listed Construction Services 25%
    Orascom Telecom Holding S.A.E* 50 Egypt $        4,720 Listed Telecommunications 22%
    National Petrochemical Company 51 Iran $        4,610 Government Chemical Manufacturing -
    Maybank Group 52 Malaysia $        4,503 Listed Commercial Banking 6%
    Saad Group Of Co.s2 53 Saudi Arabia $        4,352 Private Diversified – Construction, Healthcare, IT -
    Malaysian Airline System Bhd 54 Malaysia $        4,275 Listed Airline 14%
    Consolidated Contractors International Company 55 Saudi Arabia $        4,215 Private Construction Services 5%
    IOI Group 56 Malaysia $        4,123 Listed Palm Oil 64%
    Suez Canal Authority2 57 Egypt $        4,100 Government Misc. Transport -
    Eta – Ascon Group2 58 UAE $        4,000 Private Diversified – Engineering, Construction, other -
    Group Ona 59 Morocco $        3,930 Listed Diversified – Mining, Construction, Finance, Other 15%
    Halkbank 60 Turkey $        3,914 Listed Commercial Banking 23%
    Goldas A.Ş. 61 Turkey $        3,854 Listed Jewelry Manufacturing 72%
    Bumiputra-Commerce Holdings Bhd 62 Malaysia $        3,848 Listed Commercial Banking 28%
    Vakif Bank 63 Turkey $        3,833 Government Commercial Banking 24%
    National Commercial Bank 64 Saudi Arabia $        3,708 Government Commercial Banking 10%
    Vestel 4 65 Turkey $        3,558 Listed Appliance & Tools -3%
    Bank Melli Iran 66 Iran $        3,558 Government Commercial Banking 19%
    Dogus Holding Co. 67 Turkey $        3,487 Private Diversified – Finance, Automotive, Retail, Other 8%
    Ereğli Iron And Steel Works Co. (Erdemir)2 68 Turkey $        3,419 Listed Iron and Steel 11%
    Samir Sa 69 Morocco $        3,376 Listed Petroleum Refining 12%
    Electricity Generation Company Inc. 70 Turkey $        3,371 Government Electric Utilities -11%
    Tekel 71 Turkey $        3,200 Government Crops -
    Eczacibasi Holdings 3 72 Turkey $        3,200 Private Diversified – Pharma, Construction, Retail 14%
    Turkish Airlines 73 Turkey $        3,054 Government Airline 16%
    Saud Bahwan Group 74 Oman $        3,000 Private Retail – Automobile -
    Kuwait Projects Company (Kipco) 75 Kuwait $        2,984 Listed Diversified – Finance, Media, Healthcare 288%5
    Felda Holdings Bhd 76 Malaysia $        2,976 Private Diversified – Agriculture 31%
    Borusan Holding 77 Turkey $        2,958 Private Diversified -Steel, Auto Distribution, IT 29%
    Arab Bank Plc 78 Jordan $        2,918 Listed International Trade Financing 15%
    Ezz Steel 79 Egypt $        2,912 Listed Iron/Steel/Ferroalloys 40%
    Kazkommertsbank 80 Kazakhstan $        2,880 Listed Commercial Banking 107%
    Kuwait Finance House 81 Kuwait $        2,857 Listed Commercial Banking 44%
    Samba Financial Group 82 Saudi Arabia $        2,841 Listed Commercial Banking 7%
    UMW Holdings Bhd 83 Malaysia $        2,793 Listed Diversified – Auto, Oil & Gas, Manufacturing 1%
    Savola Group 84 Saudi Arabia $        2,775 Listed Food Processing 14%
    DP World 85 UAE $        2,731 Listed Marine Cargo Handling 32%
    Al Rajhi Banking And Investment Corp. 86 Saudi Arabia $        2,719 Listed Commercial Banking -2%
    Ciner Group2 87 Turkey $        2,680 Private Diversified – Textile, Energy, Mining -
    Public Bank Bhd. 88 Malaysia $        2,654 Listed Commercial Banking 24%
    Jordan Petroleum Refinery Company Ltd. 89 Jordan $        2,650 Listed Petroleum Refining 3%
    Boydak Holding 90 Turkey $        2,600 Private Diversified –  Furniture, Cable and other 44%
    National Bank Of Kuwait 91 Kuwait $        2,594 Listed Commercial Banking 22%
    Industries Qatar 92 Qatar $        2,561 Listed Integrated petrochemical and steel industries 20%
    Gudang Garam Tbk Pt 93 Indonesia $        2,547 Listed Tobacco 7%
    Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk., Pt 94 Indonesia $        2,499 Listed Food Processing 27%
    Sisecam 95 Turkey $        2,482 Listed Glass and Glass Product Manufacturing 28%
    Genting Berhad 96 Malaysia $        2,414 Listed Diversified – Hospitality, Plantations, Property, Other 32%
    Bank Mandiri 97 Indonesia $        2,408 Listed Commercial Banking -6%
    Orascom Construction Industries* 98 Egypt $        2,381 Listed Construction Services 9%
    Maxis Communications Berhad 99 Malaysia $        2,318 Private Telecommunications -
    Independent Petroleum Group 100 Kuwait $        2,287 Listed Petroleum/Coal Products 44%
    June 29, 2010

    Pakistani Software

    Jugaari best communication application for Jaadu, which enables users to remotely access their Mac or PC from an iPhone or iPod touch.

    Pixsense Pixsense allows mobile operators to enable video/photo uploading and sharing from a variety of mobile devices.

    PostAmazers digital media category for its animated superhero, Commander Safeguard. PostAmazers operates the largest animation and post-production studio in Pakistan.

    Produced as a mascot for Proctor & Gamble, Commander Safeguard serves as a marketing vehicle for Safeguard soap. Commander Safeguard has been renamed ‘El XXXXX’ for Latin American markets. El XXXXX is reportedly more popular in Mexico than SpongeBob SquarePants.

    A competing animation studio is Anivista, a subsidiary of Systems Limited, Pakistan’s oldest IT outsourcing company. In the U.S., Systems Limited operates as Visionet Systems and provides business intelligence, application development and maintenance services in four verticals: apparel supply chain management, banking, mortgage and insurance.

    In the e-learning category, UltraLearn Silverlight-based mashup-maker for educational environments. The mashup-maker combines text, videos, wikis and images.

    CureMD CureMD provides consolidated medical records management systems and knowledge-base tools.

    Logistics software application  Lumensoft.biz for its Candella retail-management software.

    In the financial applications category, TPS won for IRIS, its new transaction processing and middleware system for banks. TPS provides software for banks in 25 countries.

    Plexus financial applications category for its feature-rich investment management system. Plexus also produces lease management and credit management software.

    June 29, 2010

    Economic Cooperation Organization

    ECONOMIC COOPERATION ORGANIZATION
    Sustainable socio-economic development for people of the region

    • Sustainable economic development of Member States;
    • Progressive removal of trade barriers and promotion of intra- regional trade; Greater role of ECO region in the growth of world trade; Gradual integration of the economies of the Member States with the world economy;
    • Development of transport & communications infrastructure linking the Member States with each other and with the outside world;
    • Economic liberalization and privatization;
    • Mobilization and utilization of ECO region’s material resources;
    • Effective utilization of the agricultural and industrial potentials of ECO region;
    • Regional cooperation for drug abuse control, ecological and environmental protection and strengthening of historical and cultural ties among the peoples of the ECO region; and
    • Mutually beneficial cooperation with regional and international organizations.
    Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Republic of Azerbaijan Islamic  Republic of Iran Republic of Kazakhstan Kyrgyz Republic Islamic Republic of Pakistan Republic of Tajikistan Republic of Turkey Turkmenistan Republic of Uzbekistan
    Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.